IN THE PUBLIC EYE

Active Shooter Liabilities and Insurance Coverages

Author: Alliant

 

In 2020, the FBI issued a report on the number of active shooter incidents in the United States from 2000 through 2019.i The FBI defines an active shooter as “one or more individuals actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area.”ii  Implicit in the FBI’s definition of active shooter is the shooter’s use of one or more firearms.  According to the FBI report, 333 active shooter incidents meeting its definition occurred in the U.S. during this time.  In 2022, the FBI reported that there were 61 active shooter attacks in the United States in 2021, up from 40 in 2020 and 30 in 2019.iii The new high number in 2021 is a 52.5% increase from the previous year.iv The number of casualties (killed and injured) in mass shootings increased from 164 in 2020 to 243 in 2021. The day after the releasee of the FBI 2021 numbers, the Robb Elementary School shooting occurred in Uvalde, Texas, killing 19 children and 2 adults.  The Uvalde shooting is the deadliest shooting in the history of Texas public schools.v 

 

On the heels of the Uvalde shooting, active shooter incidents have been ubiquitous—on a pace of more than 2 per day.  In the 9 days immediately following the Uvalde attack, 20 shootings killed or injured at least 4 people each.vi These occurred outside a bar in Michiganvii, at a party in Californiaviii, in downtown Chattanooga, Tennesseeix,  in downtown Philadelphiax and at a medical building in Tulsa.xi 

 

According to the 2020 FBI report, during the period 2000 to 2019, 96 active shootings took place in this country inside of businesses open to pedestrian traffic, with 41 happening in businesses closed to pedestrian traffic for a total of 137.  Open spaces recorded 50 active shooter incidents during this time.  Institutions of Higher Learning (IHL’s), Pre-K through 12 educational institutions, and school board meetings had a total of 62 such incidents during the period in question, a ranking placing educational environments in second place among the list of active shooter incident locations in the report.xii  The educational location incidents resulted in 419 casualties with 179 deaths.xiii The 2021 FBI report of 61 total attacks included 32 taking place in areas of commerce (killing 68 people and injuring 72) and 28 taking place in businesses open to pedestrian traffic including 2 at educational institutions and 3 at government facilities (killing 57 people and injuring 54).xiv

 

With the occurrence of such incidents on the rise, many educational institutions are seeking insurance coverage for liabilities arising from them.  Standard terrorism insurance is not likely to cover many of the claims and expenses associated with an active shooter incident.  Though acts of terror target specific buildings or locations and thus, may trigger coverage under traditional terrorism policies requiring property damage, to trigger terrorism coverage, the motive of the attack must also be ideological, political, or religious, cause property and casualty losses more than $5 million and be deemed a certified act of terrorism by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.  

 

The FBI reports that in many active shooter incidents, the shooter has no connection to the location of the shooting, so these attacks are unpredictable. Many perpetrators of these attacks lack the types of motives required to constitute terrorism as the motives for such attacks are frequently unclear at best or unknown so the incidents would not likely qualify as certified acts of terrorism.  Therefore, terrorism policies may not cover many of the losses arising from an active shooter incident.  As for standard commercial general liability (CGL) coverage for such incidents, the language of these policies is usually vague at best on this point as most were written well before the recent surge in active shooter incidents.  Some CGL policies specifically exclude active shooter incidents from the scope of their coverage.  

 

As a result, the private insurance market is stepping up and responding to the demand for specialized, stand-alone coverages (often in the form of named peril policies) that insure against the specific and broad array of losses that can result from active shooter incidents.  In some instances, this coverage will act as gap coverage when some CGL applies and where property damages may also be covered under other insurance.  Typically, these policies, known as ‘active assailant insurance,” offer coverage for everything from first-party physical damage and third-party legal liability claims to reimbursement for medical and funeral bills, death benefits, and psychological counseling; from coverage for business interruption and loss of attraction to help with brand rehabilitation to risk assessment and crisis management services.  

 

Although active shooter coverage has been available since 2011, interest in it increased sharply after 2016 as mass shootings began to spike. In 2018, there was a ten-fold increase in the purchase of this type of coverage after the Parkland school shootings that year, according to an A.M Best Company report released in 2019. Since the 2018 shooting, 7 south Florida school districts have purchased over $3 million of active shooter coverage, according to Best.xv  

​The number of lawsuits filed against schools following active shooter incidents will only increase the need and market for this type of insurance coverage.  In October 2021, families of 17 people killed, and 30 others wounded or traumatized in the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, settled a lawsuit against the Broward County School District for $25 million. The Parkland shooting was one of the deadliest shootings in American history and the settlement was the product of two years of negotiations between the plaintiffs and the school district.xvi The settlement includes payouts to the families of the 17 fatal victims of the shooting, to 16 of the 17 persons with injuries, and to 19 people suffering severe trauma because of the incident. One student shot several times did not settle and his attorney stated he is seeking a larger payment to cover the cost of a lifetime of care for his injuries.xvii 

 

On November 30, 2021, a 15-year-old student at Oxford High School in Michigan, shot and killed 4 fellow students after school officials allowed him to remain on campus after teachers found and reported him searching online for gun ammunition and composing a note to the effect that he was having thoughts that would not stop.  In that case, school administrators met with the student and his parents asking him to seek counseling, and then made the fateful decision to allow him to remain at school after his parents resisted the idea of taking him home.xviii Following the shooting, local prosecutors not only charged the student with murder but also charged his parents with involuntary manslaughter for their conduct in refusing to take their son home when notified of his conduct and for later sending him a text making light of the entire matter.xix

 

Oxford High School administrators’ conduct has been under a microscope since the shooting.  While the school argued that since the student had no disciplinary history, then none was required here, a George Washington University law professor and student rights expert has opined that the school’s reaction was “truly astounding.” She further stated that “{a}ny individual who had the opportunity to stop this tragedy should have done so.  The question is what did they know and when did they know it.”xx

 

On December 8, 2021, parents of two surviving victims of the Oxford High School shooting filed a $100 million federal court lawsuit against the school district and its officials including the superintendent, principal, dean of students, two guidance counselors and two teachers.xxii The suit alleges violations of the student's constitutional rights and rights under Michigan law and asserts the defendants were guilty of acting with “reckless disregard” for the victims’ safety.  While many experts do not agree about whether the defendants should have known that the student posed a credible threat to other students and taken actions accordingly,xxiii it is likely that the recent filing is merely the first of what will be years of litigation faced by the school district over this incident.

 

The Parkland Florida school settlement was preceded in 2017, by an $18 million settlement by the Marysville-Pilchuck High School in Washington State with families of 5 students shot on campus after a substitute teacher was told of the possibility of the shooting did not notify school authorities.iv If the FBI statistics discussed above continue to mount, it is unfortunately likely that active shooter lawsuits against school districts may be on the rise, only increasing the market for the specialized insurance coverage applicable to this risk.

 

Public entities including school districts exploring the purchase of active assailant coverage should first review their existing coverages to determine where gaps exist that could lead to a substantially underinsured situation in the event of an active shooting incident.  Potential purchasers should then be aware that most active assailant policies contain common exclusions such as a terrorism exclusion for certified acts of terrorism; employee exclusions as these claimants are covered by workers’ compensation coverage; vehicle exclusions and mental anguish exclusions.  Potential purchasers should watch out for some other exclusions that may make the coverage less valuable than it needs to be.  These include exclusions for acts arising out of domestic violence since approximately 30% of workplace violence is known to be related to this behavior.  Some policies require that a specific number of deaths or victims be involved before triggering coverage. No one wants to be in the position of having to advise an injured party or an insured that there is no coverage for a claim following a shooting because too few people were killed or injured.  

 

Active assailant coverage can be very expensive.  Depending on size, annual premiums for educational institutions, for example, can range from $1,800 to $20 million. 

[i] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-20-year-review-2000-2019-060121.pdf/view

[ii] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-20-year-review-2000-2019-060121.pdf/view

[iii] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-in-the-us-2021-052422.pdf/view

[iv] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-in-the-us-2021-052422.pdf/view

[v] School.

[vi] https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/.

[vii] https://www.abc57.com/news/shooting-in-benton-harbor-kills-one-and-injures-six

[viii] https://abc30.com/house-party-shooting-beachwood-area-merced-county/11906190/.

[ix] https://newschannel9.com/news/local/i-wanted-to-make-sure-they-were-okay-uber-driver-helps-chattanooga-shooting-victims.

[x] https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharysmith/2022/06/05/tennessee-and-pennsylvania-face-deadly-overnight-mass-shootings-as-us-focuses-on-gun-violence/?sh=13e9855f6181.

[xi] https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/06/01/us/tulsa-shooting-oklahoma-news.

[xii] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-20-year-review-2000-2019-060121.pdf/view

[xiii] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-20-year-review-2000-2019-060121.pdf/view

[xiv] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-in-the-us-2021-052422.pdf/view.

[xv] https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/00010101/NEWS06/912329612/Demand-for-active-shooter-cover-growing-AM-Best

[xvi] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/19/us/parkland-shooting-settlement.html

[xvii] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/19/us/parkland-shooting-settlement.html

[xviii] https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2021/12/05/james-and-jennifer-crumbley-ethan-oxford-high-shooting/8867284002/

[xix] https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2021/12/05/james-and-jennifer-crumbley-ethan-oxford-high-shooting/8867284002/; On February 24, 2022, a court, after hearing extensive evidence, ruled that Crumbley’s parents will stand trial on the charges. https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/24/us/ethan-crumbley-parents-michigan-shooting/index.html

[xx] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/04/us/oxford-high-school-responsibility-legal.html

[xxi] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/09/us/michigan-school-shooting-lawsuits-oxford.html

[xxii] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/11/opinion/schools-students-staff.html

[xxiii] https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/law-justice/families-of-victims-of-marysville-pilchuck-high-school-mass-shooting-settle-lawsuit-for-18-million/#:~:text=The%20families%20of%20the%20five,Superior%20Court%20on%20Monday%20morning